Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Tea companies to merge

As a result of the transaction, both companies and their brands will operate independently under the DrinkWorks trade name, officials said. The financial terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

Officials said the merger is intended to leverage the manufacturing capabilities and distribution reach of both Boulder-based Third Street, a supplier of chai and lemonade concentrates under the Third Street and Pixie Mate brands, and Louisville-based Cooper Tea, which makes iced tea concentrates.

The merger evolved out of a September 2010 joint venture between the two firms under which they launched a line of co-branded iced tea concentrates, said Barry Cooper, founder and chief executive officer of Cooper Tea.

"When we put together that joint marketing venture with the iced tea, it was almost a natural progression," he said. "It sort of emerged and we found ourselves kind of simpatico."

Both specialized in concentrated tea beverages and commitments to organic and sustainable products, but had different distribution areas and specialties, Cooper said. While Cooper distributes primarily to the food service and convenience store channel, Third Street plays in the retail realm, he said.

In addition, Third Street has expertise in the manufacturing and production side, while Cooper`s expertise is in global sourcing and research and development, he said.

"One of the tremendous assets that we bring to the party is a really, really strong (research and development) background," he said, noting his past roles with Celestial Seasonings and Lipton. "We have some really good stuff in the hopper."

Both companies will continue to operate in their respective locales, their employees and their brands, said John Simmons, president and founder of Third Street.

"Where it makes sense to realize synergies, we`ll do so," he said, giving Cooper`s connections to global tea estates as an example. "... For me, personally, it`s a great learning experience to take part in those relationships and essentially to connect our consumers more directly to the tea estates and the farmers we work with around the world."

Third Street, which recently was a recipient of a Local Producer Loan from Whole Foods, has ramped up its production capabilities to meet increasing demand, Simmons said. Further manufacturing, work force and infrastructure investments could be made as a result of the merger, he added.

Simmons and Cooper both said that their work forces could grow as a result of the merger. Third Street has 22 employees and Cooper has 18 employees.

Contact Camera Business Writer Alicia Wallace at 303-473-1332 or wallacea@dailycamera.com.


View the original article here

Ohio Tea Partier on Boehner: 'I Am Sick of the Tears'

House Speaker John Boehner told Ohio Tea Partiers at a private meeting last month that it might take a really long time to right the nation's balance sheet--like 50 years. The Tea Partiers did not like what they heard, not one bit, Reuters' Nick Carey reports. "I am sick of the tears," Denise Roberts, of the Preble County Liberty Group, said of Boehner's famous emotional displays. "I want results." Roberts said her "fantasy" was to "primary" Boehner--to find a candidate to challenge him in the Republican primary. Likewise, SoCal Tax Revolt Coalition's Dawn Wildman said of the GOP establishment, "At this point, all of them are potential targets. ... All the way up to Boehner."

Boehner told attendees of the Tea Party meeting that yes, the debt ceiling would have to be raised--multiple times. And it would take five decades to erase the deficit. The activists are shocked, Carey reports, and their anger is shared by dozens of Tea Party leaders across the country. "They just don't get that we elected them not because we love them, but only because they weren't Democrats," the Dallas Tea Party's Phillip Dennis told Carey. "Our war now is with the Republican Party." The Wisconsin Grandsons of Liberty's Tim Dake echoed that comment, saying that before the election, Republicans "told us what they knew we wanted to hear and sought us out." After last fall's victory, though, "All of a sudden they stopped taking our calls and were no longer interested in what we had to say."

The Tea Partiers aren't content to merely send angry emails to their elected representatives. They're working to unseat the Republicans who've betrayed them since taking office. So far, Indiana Sen. Dick Lugar is facing a primary challenge from the state treasurer, and there is talk of challenges to Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch and Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe.

The Virginia Tea Party Alliance's Karen Hurd is part of the effort to defeat House Minority Leader Eric Cantor. Hurd plans on waging an "information campaign" against Cantor, focusing on his support of the 2008 financial bailout. But she knows it will be difficult. "Right now Cantor is impregnable, but if we can make him vulnerable then he can be primaried... A few years ago challenging Cantor was inconceivable. The big change now is that while it's a huge challenge, it's not impossible."


View the original article here

Monday, May 30, 2011

Boulder County's Third Street Chai, Cooper Tea merge

Third Street Chai and Cooper Tea Co., two Boulder County-based makers of concentrated beverages, have agreed to merge operations, company officials announced Thursday.


As a result of the transaction, both companies and their brands will operate independently under the DrinkWorks trade name, officials said. The financial terms of the agreement were not disclosed.


Officials said the merger is intended to leverage the manufacturing capabilities and distribution reach of both Boulder-based Third Street, a supplier of chai and lemonade concentrates under the Third Street and Pixie Mate brands, and Louisville-based Cooper Tea, which makes iced tea concentrates.


The merger evolved out of a September 2010 joint venture between the two firms under which they launched a line of co-branded iced tea concentrates, said Barry Cooper, founder and chief executive officer of Cooper Tea.


"When we put together that joint marketing venture with the iced tea, it was almost a natural progression," he said. "It sort of emerged and we found ourselves kind of simpatico."


Both specialized in concentrated tea beverages and commitments to organic and sustainable products, but had different distribution areas and specialties, Cooper said. While Cooper distributes primarily to the food service and convenience store channel, Third Street plays in the retail realm, he said.


In addition, Third Street has expertise in the manufacturing and production side, while Cooper's expertise is in global sourcing and research and development, he said.


"One of the tremendous assets that we bring to the party is a really, really strong (research and development) background," he said, noting his past roles with Celestial Seasonings and Lipton. "We have some really good stuff in the hopper."


Both companies will continue to operate in their respective locales, their employees and their brands, said John Simmons, president and founder of Third Street.


"Where it makes sense to realize synergies, we'll do so," he said, giving Cooper's connections to global tea estates as an example. "... For me, personally, it's a great learning experience to take part in those relationships and essentially to connect our consumers more directly to the tea estates and the farmers we work with around the world."


Third Street, which recently was a recipient of a Local Producer Loan from Whole Foods, has ramped up its production capabilities to meet increasing demand, Simmons said. Further manufacturing, work force and infrastructure investments could be made as a result of the merger, he added.


Simmons and Cooper both said that their work forces could grow as a result of the merger. Third Street has 22 employees and Cooper has 18 employees.


Contact Camera Business Writer Alicia Wallace at 303-473-1332 or wallacea@dailycamera.com.


View the original article here

Tea party places bets on Bruning vs. Nelson

Tea party places bets on Bruning vs. NelsonBy Robynn Tysver | Wednesday, May 11, 2011 4:07 AM CDT

Adjust story text size: Make font size smaller Make font size larger

Omaha World-Herald OMAHA - The Tea Party Express has hitched its wagon to Republican Jon Bruning. The national group plans to make an early endorsement in Nebraska's 2012 U.S. Senate race, and Bruning will earn the nod Wednesday despite not yet securing the GOP nomination, said Sal Russo, a spokesman for the Tea Party Express. Russo said the group wanted to make clear with its first 2012 endorsement that ousting Democratic U.S. Sen. Ben Nelson will be a top priority. He also said Bruning is the "strongest candidate" in the race, and they wanted to help him early in the campaign. The endorsement will be made at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. The group's early entry into the Nebraska race comes with some tension. Local tea party supporters say they believe it's "premature," and they question why the national group did not interview the other top candidate in the race, State Treasurer Don Stenberg.

Bruning is running for the GOP nomination against Stenberg and Schuyler businessman Pat Flynn. In addition, other Republicans have been mulling whether to jump into the race, including State Sen. Deb Fischer of Valentine. Joanne Elliott, co-organizer of Conservative Connections in Lincoln, said her group was "disappointed" that the national group was weighing into a Nebraska race without getting "input" from local groups. Others echoed her sentiments. "It's a little early - 12 months out of the primary," said Patrick Bonnett, the founder of a coalition of about a dozen tea party-affiliated groups in Douglas County, the Conservative Coalition of Nebraska. Bonnett said he has heard of no tea party organization in Nebraska that plans to make an endorsement before the primary. Paul Johnson, Nelson's campaign manager, downplayed the endorsement. He said it appeared to be more about raising money nationally than influencing Nebraskans, noting that the endorsement is being made in D.C. He also questioned the group's influence, saying several of the group's chosen candidates in the last election failed. "They also made Christine O'Donnell, Sharron Angle and Joe Miller priorities - all of whom lost," said Johnson. Russo did not shy away from his group's 2010 failures. He says that is one reason they are jumping into the Nebraska race early, to help Bruning with his campaign. He said neither the Angle nor the Miller campaigns were as strong as they needed to be to win. The group gave about $1 million each to Angle and Miller, Russo said. "We believe Jon Bruning is a strong candidate," he said. "He's strongly in tune with tea party values. He's also able to put together a first-rate campaign." - World-Herald News Service




The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of nptelegraph.com.
We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site. Please be patient. It may take until the following business day for posts to be reviewed.

Entering your first and last name along with a valid email address will greatly increase the chances of your comment being approved!

We do not allow posts to contain links / URL's to external Websites. Posts containing links or URL's to external sites will be edited or deleted at the discretion of Telegraph staff.

To post your comment, please enter the text displayed in the image above into the form field. CASE SENSITIVE! Please note: We provide our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, unsubstantiated accusations, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.


Copyright c 2011 North Platte Telegraph. All rights reserved.

| | .

North Platte Telegraph
621 N Chestnut
PO Box 370
North Platte, NE 69101
Tel: 308-532-6000
Fax: 308-532-9268


View the original article here

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Tea Party celebrates loss

FRANKFORT — David Williams won.

But Wednesday the Tea Party celebrated even though its candidate, Phil Moffett, lost the Republican primary for governor.

Moffett had no money, no name recognition, no backing from establishment Republicans and he never got within 20 points of Williams in publicly released polls. Yet he denied Williams a majority of the vote in the three-way race, which included Jefferson County Clerk Bobbie Holsclaw, and won big in Fayette County and the “Golden Triangle.” In the end, Williams won a plurality by about 14,000 votes and 10 percentage points, but that was closer than it was supposed to be.

The Tea Party “reared its head yesterday, the hard-core grassroots people who want a new direction in Kentucky and in our country,” said Mica Sim’s who operates a blog (www. micadaily.blogspot.com) and heads the Tea Party chapter in Lexington. Despite her disappointment that Moffett isn’t the Republican Party’s nominee, Sims was giddy Wednesday.

“We are here to stay,” Sims said. Now, she said, both parties are taking notice and they’ll be reluctant to “marginalize” Tea Party supporters, something she charges Williams with doing.

It’s not just Sims who saw Moffett’s performance as proof of the Tea Party’s influence in Kentucky politics. The pros noticed, too.

“I think that’s the only conclusion you can draw,” said Ted Jackson, a Republican political consultant from Louisville.

“No question about it,” said Danny Briscoe, a former Democratic Party of Kentucky chairman and political consultant. “The Tea Party played a big role in Moffett’s performance.”

Republican John David Dyche, a contributing columnist for The Courier-Journal who authored a political biography of Mitch McConnell, wondered before Tuesday’s election if the Tea Party were more a national force than one which affects state politics. But he said Moffett’s performance Tuesday and wins by Tea Party supported candidates Bill Johnson for secretary of state and John Kemper for auditor demonstrate the group’s state influence.

Moffett’s campaign manager David Adams said before Tuesday’s election that Moffett’s more highly motivated volunteers from the Tea Party would overcome Williams’ advantages. He was wrong, but not by much.

“I think the Tea Party after-effect of this primary election will just continue to grow and it will become an even more unmanageable force,” Adams said.

But if the Tea Party is more a force in Kentucky than many thought, will its followers get behind Williams against incumbent Democratic governor Steve Beshear? Not necessarily, said Adams and Sims.

Moffett told Williams he will support him in the general election, but also said he couldn’t guarantee his supporters would follow. Sims flatly said she won’t support Williams who she views as a “RINO” — Republican in name only — who has supported polices that expand government.

Adams said it’s possible some Tea Party and Moffett supporters might get behind Williams — if Williams engages Tea Party groups in “a serious dialogue.”


View the original article here

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Florida tea party leaders not discouraged

TALLAHASSEE -- Tea party leaders are cheering one of the most conservative legislative sessions in recent history, even if it was only a fraction of what they wanted.

They claim significant victories on the budget, pension reform and health care, but most of their proposals failed to pass the Republican-controlled House and Senate.

Organizers in the conservative movement parrot Gov. Rick Scott when asked to summarize the session, saying progress was made and more will be accomplished next year.

But while some tea party leaders talk about learning the give and take of the legislative process, others already have identified Republicans to target in the 2012 elections.

Tim Gaitens, state director for Florida FreedomWorks, said he plans to recruit primary opponents to run against Republican Sens. Jack Latvala of St. Petersburg, Jim Norman of Tampa and Thad Altman of Melbourne.

But Gaitens gives other Republicans a pass. He said the Florida Alliance, a coalition of 130 tea party groups that settled on a legislative agenda for this year, no longer plans to grade lawmakers.

“When you try to rate a politician, the legislative process gets in the way,” Gaitens said. “Sometimes there’s a bill that he or she needs to support. We’re very aware of this.”

Clyde Fabretti, a co-founder of the West Orlando Tea Party, talked about a “maturation process” for the fledgling tea party movement.

“We’re pragmatic enough to understand that not every single issue was going to be a success,” he said. “I’m pleased with what we got done and there will be another session next year.”

The tea party movement won a major victory on the state budget, which includes no significant tax or fee increases.

Teachers, law enforcement and other state workers will have to contribute to their pensions for the first time in decades.

A pair of state constitutional amendments taking aim at state spending and the federal health insurance laws are on the November 2012 statewide ballot.

But Republican leaders failed to pass 20 other bills and resolutions on the tea party’s agenda.

Some of the proposals that failed included:

n A bill prohibiting Florida courts from relying on Muslim Sharia law or legal codes from other nations when making decisions. (SB 1294, HB 1273)

n A resolution calling on Congress to amend the U.S. Constitution so that federal laws can be overturned if two-thirds of state legislatures agree. (SCR 1558)

n A repeal of the Florida Climate Protection Act, which authorizes the state to create a cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emission. (SB 762)

But tea party leaders have been most vocal about the Legislature’s failure to approve tougher immigration standards. They wanted lawmakers to:

n Force Florida businesses to use a federal database, known as E-Verify, to check their employees’ citizenship. (SB 518, HB 691)

n Let law enforcement check the citizenship of citizens when there is “reasonable suspicion.” (SB 136, HB 237)

n Expedite the deportation process by creating new agreements between the state and federal government. (SB 304, HB 205)

None of the bills passed.

Sen. Alan Hays, R-Umatilla, had more bills on the tea party’s agenda than any other lawmaker, including the E-Verify proposal.

Hays said he will tell tea party members he is “proud” of the Legislature’s work this year. Hays is scheduled to speak to several tea party groups this summer.

“It’s a matter of trying to turn a battleship at sea,” Hays said. “You can’t maneuver a battleship the way you do a jet ski.”


View the original article here

Tea Party ups the pressure on establishment Republicans

DAYTON, Ohio?— This John Boehner was not the John Boehner that Tea Party leaders in the room thought they knew.

Compared to the Boehner who talked tough on spending ahead of last November's elections, the one who showed up at Club 55, just off Interstate 75 in Troy in southwestern Ohio, struck them as timid.

The private April 25 meeting was convened by the Speaker of the House of Representatives at the request of Tea Party leaders, who were seething over recent Republican compromises, most notably on the 2011 budget.

One of the 25 or so leaders, all from Boehner's district, asked him if Republicans would raise America's $14.3 trillion debt limit.

Will special elections predict House power shift? If Democrat Kathy Hochul wins next Tuesday’s special election in a New York’s 26th Congressional District, a district that has been Republican for years, will it be a harbinger of Republicans losing the House majority in 2012?

Pawlenty to launch presidential run next week Pawlenty hopes to turn bootstrap story to favor Gingrich soldiers on, suggests immigration plan Obama jolt unlikely to spark Mideast peace talks Story: For GOP first termer, a mixed reaction on Medicare vote

According to half a dozen attendees interviewed by Reuters, the most powerful Republican in Washington said "yes."

2012 White House race: What matters, and what doesn't

"And we're going to have to raise it again in the future," he added. With the mass retirement of America's Baby Boomers, he explained, it would take 20 years to balance the U.S. budget and 30 years after that to erase the nation's huge fiscal deficit.

That answer incensed many of the Tea Party activists, for whom raising the debt limit is anathema.

Slideshow: Faces of the Tea Party

"You could have knocked me out of my chair," said Denise Robertson, a computer programer who belongs to the Preble County Liberty Group. "Fifty years?"

She said "my fantasy now" is someone will challenge Boehner in the 2012 Republican primaries. "If we could find someone good to run against him, I'd campaign for them every day," Robertson said.

"I am sick of the tears," she added, a sarcastic reference to Boehner's famous propensity to cry. "I want results."

Fed up with "broken promises," some Tea Party activists have already moved beyond the fantasy stage and aim to "primary" Republicans who have let them down — that is, challenge them in primaries. Some talk of long-shot attempts to unseat leaders like House Majority Whip Eric Cantor.

Story: Tea Party godfather Ron Paul declares 2012 bid

Led by Boehner, Republicans in Congress are at odds with Democrats and the White House over how to raise the limit on how much debt the United States can afford. President Barack Obama's administration warns of global financial chaos if lawmakers do not increase the current cap of $14.3 trillion.

Boehner, in a May 9 speech in New York, did insist that any increase to the debt limit include "cuts in trillions." But conservatives expect the Republicans will not uphold his demand.

If the Republicans lose the debt limit battle, more Tea Party groups say they will aggressively seek candidates to challenge establishment figures in the 2012 primaries.

"At this point, all of them are potential targets," said Dawn Wildman, president of the SoCal Tax Revolt Coalition, who lives in San Diego. "All the way up to Boehner."

Failure an option?
Born in the days after Obama took office in early 2009 in a wave of conservative anger at corporate bailouts and hefty government spending to stem the Great Recession, the Tea Party movement has come a long way in just two years.

After failing to halt the passage of Obama's health reform bill, Tea Partiers staffed phone banks, knocked on doors to get out the vote and played a major role in gaining 63 seats for the Republicans in the 2010 elections.

The biggest midterm election year swing since 1938 delivered a large House majority for the Republicans and made gains in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

Flush with victory, Tea Partiers dived headfirst into local and state politics in 2011 — the results of which are expected to affect the state and national elections of 2012.

Their primary foe is still America's progressive left — it is a given in Ohio, for instance, that the top target for 2012 is Democratic U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown.

Story: Rep. Bachmann: Always rising, never compromising

But now more than ever before the full force of their ire is directed at the Republican Party establishment.

Dozens of interviews with Tea Party activists across the country paint a picture of a conservative movement whose members gave the Republican Party in Washington a chance to prove it was serious about fiscal responsibility after years of running up deficits under Obama's predecessor George W. Bush.

And many Republican politicians promised to uphold the Tea Party's central tenets — constitutionally limited government, lower taxes and the free markets.

"They certainly talked the talk before the election," said Tim Dake of the Wisconsin Grandsons of Liberty. "They told us what they knew we wanted to hear and sought us out."

After the election, not so much.

"All of a sudden they stopped taking our calls and were no longer interested in what we had to say," Dake said.

Hoping for meaningful change, they watched as either the same people — Boehner and Cantor — or party loyalists took up leadership positions in the House.

Story: In D.C., Obama tries to fire up frustrated supporters

Then came the first real battle of the new Congress that mattered to the Tea Party — cutting spending in the 2011 budget. Instead of $100 billion in cuts the Republicans promised in their "Pledge to America" unveiled last September, Republicans and Democrats agreed on $38 billion.

When the Congressional Budget Office said the real spending reduction was $352 million that set many Tea Partiers boiling.

"They volunteered that damn promise of $100 billion, we didn't ask for it," said Randy Keller of the Bowling Green Southern Kentucky Tea Party. "They seem to think that we can't handle simple math. We in the Tea Party are so angry we can't stand it."

Not raising America's debt ceiling has now taken on even greater importance for Tea Party groups.

The April 25 meeting with Boehner and inside accounts of others between House Republicans and Tea Partiers in their districts hint at a party trying to manage expectations ahead of the real debt limit debate. The trouble is while compromise is a trademark of Washington politics, to many Tea Partiers it is a dirty word.

According to Ned Ryun, head of American Majority, which provides training for conservative activists, the Republicans' problem is they mistook their November victory as a sign the Tea Party backed them because its members are conservatives.

"The Republican establishment suffers from a weird belief that somehow the Tea Party will fall in line because it is an adjunct of the Republican Party," he said. "But the Tea Party is not and never will be an arm of the Republican Party."

That leaves Boehner stuck between the Tea Party and a hard place.

If he pushes too hard on cuts, that will rattle the Republican Party's powerful Wall Street wing, potentially roiling the markets and unsettling the broader electorate.

But backing down will also hurt him. "After accusations he didn't do enough in the budget battle, Boehner has to have something real to take back to conservatives or he's in trouble," said James McCormick, a professor of political science at Iowa State University. "He's boxed in between two components of the Republican Party. Obama knows that and is not under the same pressure."

Story: Huckabee 'says no', widens open GOP field

If the Republicans falter, the search for establishment targets will kick into a higher gear — with freshmen, or those elected in 2010 seen as the easiest to unseat as they are new.

"The Tea Party will almost certainly primary those they want to get rid of," said Larry Sabato, a politics professor at the University of Virginia. "They are not out to rebuild the Republican Party. They are out to take over the Republican Party and make it more like the Tea Party."

"If it takes some Republican defeats along the way to make that happen, then that is what they'll do," he added.

'Screw up a free lunch in a soup kitchen'
When night fell on election day last Nov. 2, Tea Partiers across the country were flat out exhausted.

Most activists in the amorphous movement are unpaid. Many have full-time jobs as well as volunteering for the cause.

In the run-up to the election an army of volunteers learned the mechanics of electioneering: from manning phone banks to knocking on doors to get people to the polls.

Ana Puig of the Kitchen Table Patriots in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, says her group staffed a "Liberty Headquarters" 12 hours a day for four months, made 36,000 phone calls, knocked on 20,000 doors and handed out 5,000 yard signs, helping to elect conservative Pat Toomey to the U.S. Senate.

"The Republicans would not have been able to achieve those results by itself," said Puig. "We reached the folks the Republican Party could not."

This is the real power of the Tea Party in its raw form: the ability to get voters to the polls.

Tea Party activists in many states describe with contempt an "atrophied" Republican Party machine that in some places they have taken over or ignored entirely.

"The Ohio state Republican Party would screw up a free lunch in a soup kitchen," said Ralph King of the Cleveland Tea Party, a sentiment echoed elsewhere, though less colorfully.

After the election, Tea Party groups in many states immersed themselves in local and state politics — a task made easier by massive Tea Party-infused gains for Republicans at the state level.

Groups in states like Wisconsin, Indiana, New Hampshire and Ohio have pushed "right to work" bills to take on the unions.

Others have backed voter identification bills, under consideration now in 25 states, which conservatives say would prevent voter fraud. Democrats say these bills would lower the turnout for minority, low-income and elderly voters. In Texas, Tea Parties have pushed hard for cuts to the state budget.

Story: Rep. Ryan: Gingrich misunderstood Medicare plan

Social conservatives have used new Republican majorities in state houses to pass some bills targeting abortions. Others are pushing gun rights legislation.

And in many states Tea Party groups have pushed back against Obama's healthcare reform — dubbed "Obamacare." In Ohio activists are nearing the 386,000 signatures needed for a statewide ballot in November challenging the mandate that individuals obtain health insurance.

"We needed time to breathe," said Chris Littleton, head of the Ohio Liberty Council, who said he is happy control of Washington is divided in the short term because it has allowed Tea Party groups in Ohio "to build up infrastructure."

"By not having a federal agenda flying at us, we have been able to focus more on local and state politics in 2011," he said, "before we go back to federal politics in 2012."

There has been some media attention devoted recently to the fact that attendance at Tea Party rallies, the hallmark of the early days of the movement, has dwindled.

But Tea Partiers say they are too busy learning how the political system works — prior to 2009 most had little or no political experience — and that rallies produce few results.

"Rallies get people off the couch," Wisconsin Grandsons of Liberty's Dake said. "But the return on investment from all the work and money that you have to put into them is not very high. What we've found is that people want to have an impact, even if it is just at the local level."

Though the anger may burn with a lower intensity than the white-hot rage of the early days, it still burns — and the Tea Party is trying to put that to good use.

"You can't sustain that kind of anger for long, it drains you," said Jim Lefler of the Southwest Michigan Tea Party. "We've learned to channel our anger to get results."

'Our war now is with the Republicans'
Irrespective of their immersion on local politics, however, the Tea Party movement has maintained its laser focus on the national political scene.

Despite their fervent opposition to Obama's health reform, few appear impressed by the symbolic vote in January in the House to repeal the law — it never stood a chance in the Democratic-controlled Senate, let alone reached Obama's desk.

"That vote was just so Republicans could go home and campaign by saying they voted to repeal Obamacare," said Paul Keith, chairman of the Bowling Green Southern Kentucky Tea Party. "That vote was meaningless, it was crap."

"The things that matter to us are what the Republicans control. Where if they don't cooperate, there is no deal."

The fiscal 2011 budget was one such thing. In their "Pledge to America" the party promised spending cuts of $100 billion "in the first year alone and putting us on a path to begin paying down the debt, balancing the budget, and ending the spending spree in Washington."

Story: Fox parent company to disclose political giving

Not only did Tea Party members around the country note which Republicans voted for the 2011 budget — especially those who ran as fiscal conservatives last year — they are also aware of the 59 Republicans who voted against it.

Tea Party members in Ohio, for instance, know three House Republicans held the Tea Party line — Jim Jordan, Steve Chabot and Jean Schmidt — while nine did not, including Boehner.

For some Tea Party groups the budget was too much. So they want to target RINOs — Republicans In Name Only, a pejorative term conservatives use for moderate Republicans.

"There isn't any urgency among the establishment Republicans," said Phillip Dennis of the Dallas Tea Party. "They just don't get that we elected them not because we love them, but only because they weren't Democrats."

"Our war now is with the Republican Party," he added. "We need to send home a whole boatload of RINOs."

So far the only high-profile attempt to "primary" a moderate Republican in 2012 is Indiana, where conservative state treasurer Richard Mourdock is challenging Senator Dick Lugar, who has steadfastly refused to change his views.

But others are mentioned as possible.

Utah Senator Orrin Hatch is one, though no challenger has yet come forward. Tea Party groups in a number of states are eyeing potential candidates for House races, but say their searches are still in the early stages.

Perhaps the highest-profile member of the House whom Tea Partiers hope to unseat is Eric Cantor. Karen Hurd of the Virginia Tea Party Alliance is working on a two-pronged strategy to challenge him. The House Majority leader is considered conservative by many, but Hurd says he is a RINO.

Hurd is compiling an "information campaign" highlighting his record, including voting for the unpopular 2008 bank bailout. If the campaign gains traction, Hurd wants to find a challenger, though she acknowledges that is a tall order. Cantor's is a safe seat and he can raise a lot of money.

"Right now Cantor is impregnable, but if we can make him vulnerable then he can be primaried," Hurd said. "A few years ago challenging Cantor was inconceivable. The big change now is that while it's a huge challenge, it's not impossible."

Others, like Dake of the Wisconsin Grandsons of Liberty, are waiting to see how their Republicans vote in the near future. The more they stray from the fiscal conservative line, the more likely they will be challenged.

"It's still early in the year," he said. "We'll give them a couple more votes before we decide."

'Not one hand went up'
Tea Party leaders who attended the April 25 meeting with John Boehner — a member of his office confirmed much of the account given by those who spoke to Reuters — recall he put on a nice spread: quiche, fruit, some "nice cheese" and such.

But the assembled leaders found his answers on raising the debt limit unpalatable.

Ron Musilli, 62, a native of Troy, recalls asking Boehner what leverage points the Republicans planned to focus on in debt limit talks with the White House and Senate Democrats.

"We haven't figured that out yet," he recalls Boehner replied.

Musilli says that was "a little disconcerting. My kids will be retiring in 50 years, so I like to see a plan to reduce the deficit before then."

When someone asked what happened to the bold-talking John Boehner of October 2012, the Speaker became frustrated and responded with a question: "Would you have the United States default on its obligations?"

For many, the short answer is yes.

Gene Clem, a spokesman for the Michigan Tea Party Alliance, says at a meeting of 120 activists from 12 Michigan counties at the end of April he asked who wanted to raise the debt limit.

"Not one hand went up," he said. "Not one."

Others want the Republicans to force the Democrats to agree to major cuts before they raise the debt limit. Boehner and other Republicans have talked tough in recent days about slashing spending. Now the onus is on them to deliver.

The University of Virginia's Sabato said the Republicans' predicament is they cannot do enough to please a movement that wants drastic cuts and dislikes compromise.

"The Tea Party wants to take it (the debt limit debate) to the brink," he said. "The Republicans won't go there because they know the price will be too high for them."

The Republicans' corporate wing would prefer a mix of gradual spending cuts and tax increases, which conflicts with the Tea Party's ideals of both lower taxes and spending.

Matt Kibbe, CEO of FreedomWorks, which has provided logistical support for some Tea Party groups, said corporate support for the banking sector bailout, the stimulus package and even for healthcare reform had been unpopular with Tea Party activists.

That has created what Kibbe called "a growing divide" between the Tea Party and corporate America.

'Not qualified to be dog catcher'
Tea Party groups learned some tough lessons in the 2010 election. First, they often split the vote between them when going up against establishment figures.

Hoping to avoid the same mistakes, the Michigan Tea Party Alliance, a coalition of Tea Party groups across the state, is working out guidelines to agree on one challenger per seat.

The other main drawback in 2010 was that Tea Party neophytes often chose candidates whose track records or background made them unelectable.

Possibly the prime example of that was Christine O'Donnell, who beat a moderate candidate in the Republican primary for the U.S. Senate seat in Delaware, but whose campaign foundered in part over embarrassing revelations of dabbling in witchcraft. Some establishment Republicans claim poor Tea Party choices cost them the Senate.

"Let's face it, we had people who were solidly unqualified for dog catcher, let alone the office they were running for," said SoCal Tax Revolt Coalition's Wildman.

"The other thing we are learning now is what happens when naive people get into high office," she added of some of the freshmen the Tea Party helped elect.

"So we are learning how to vet candidates properly."

While being a complete outsider was seen as a plus last year, Tea Party groups are now looking for conservative candidates with a track record and name recognition.

Some in the movement have run or plan to run for office at the local level. But they will not be ready for primetime until they have worked their way up the political ladder, which is some years off at best.

"The biggest challenge we are facing is finding people to run," said Ken Emanuelson of the Dallas Tea Party. "We need an experienced person with a political track record. It may take several cycles to get the right people in place."

But even an unsuccessful run can be bad news for an establishment candidate, forcing them to spend time and vast sums of money, plus move further to the right to win the primary. In short, incumbents fear primary challenges.

"I get a lot of feedback from people locally and from around the country and it's pretty clear the Republicans do not want us to influence the primaries in 2012," said Jane Aitken of the New Hampshire Tea Party Coalition. "They hate us, but they are terrified of us too."

"But whether the Republicans want us to or not, we are going to influence the primaries next year."

American Majority's Ryun says he expects a few high-profile Republicans may be beaten in primaries next year.

But the Tea Party is expected to find easier targets among the freshmen of 2010. After two years their name recognition will not be that high and many of them are in marginal seats.

Even if challenges for high-profile establishment figures prove unsuccessful, they will get the attention of others.

"It would send a message to all other Republicans," the University of Virginia's Sabato said. "If it could happen to someone as powerful as, say, Eric Cantor, it could certainly happen to you."

Winning the party's soul
How that plays out in the general election is an open question. While the Tea Party will have an out-sized impact on Republican primaries, its success in November 2012 will depend on how acceptable its candidates are to the broader electorate.

The fierce battles going on at the state level over collective bargaining rights or spending cuts are also a factor to watch, as, thanks in part to the Tea Party, those fights are further to the right than the debate in Washington.

"There is very little doubt in my mind that establishment Republicans are very worried," said James Henson, a politics professor at the University of Texas. "They are having to watch their right flank and may end up leveraged in the middle."

"A lot of people are thinking in the abstract that cutting taxes and spending is good," he added. "But the question is what challenges the reality poses for the Republicans."

Henson also says "divisions the Tea Party has created within the Republican Party have already complicated the party's presidential race," as some candidates will wait until the battle for the party's soul has been decided.

That leaves what almost every Tea Party activist interviewed described essentially as a lackluster field.

Conservative New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's name was the only one mentioned consistently with any excitement in informal polling for this article, even though he says he will not run. Another candidate who has raised some interest is Herman Cain, a political outsider and former pizza chain CEO.

Minnesota Representative Michele Bachmann has courted the Tea Party actively, but her name was barely mentioned.

In one small survey of 68 Tea Party leaders in Ohio conducted in April by the Ohio Liberty Council, in which respondents were asked who they wanted for president, Christie won with 15 votes. Bachmann got four votes, level with real estate tycoon Donald Trump, who said on Monday he would not run.

At the back of the pack, alongside former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum and Barack Obama, was former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney with zero votes. In general polls, Romney currently leads the Republican pack, but the health reform he passed in office — dubbed "Romneycare" — is despised by conservatives for its similarities to Obama's health reform.

"Romneycare is the kiss of death for his campaign," said Christen Varley of the Greater Boston Tea Party.

Just how bad is the divide between the Tea Party and the Republican establishment? "Could the Tea Party harm the Republicans?" said Stuart Rothenberg of the Rothenberg Political Report. "If it pushes too hard then it could fracture the Republican Party."

For some people on the ground like Colleen Conley of the Rhode Island Tea Party, a bit of party fracturing might not be a bad idea.

"If the Republicans can't come through on their promises," she said, "maybe the party needs to be blown up."

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.


View the original article here

Friday, May 27, 2011

Nevada Tea Party chairman quits, announces support for Sharron Angle

LAS VEGAS (AP) ? The chairman of the Tea Party of Nevada resigned Tuesday after a recording was made public capturing Republican Sharron Angle badmouthing GOP leaders during a meeting with the shadowy group?s U.S. Senate candidate.

The exit of chairman Syd James is another blow to the candidacy of Tea Party of Nevada nominee Scott Ashjian, who has been denounced by state tea party leaders who say he has no connection to the movement that advocates limited government and tightfisted public spending.

In a statement, James said he was endorsing Angle, whose uneasy relations with national Republicans were laid bare in the tape, which Ashjian recorded secretly and later released to the Las Vegas Sun newspaper.

James said he arranged the meeting to see if Ashjian would consider withdrawing from the race and backing Angle, who is trying to oust Majority Leader Harry Reid.

?I gave the Angle campaign my word that this was to be a private meeting and not tape recorded. I feel my personal integrity and honor was violated when Scott taped what was to be a private conversation and then made it public,? James said in a statement.

?I can understand why the Angle campaign feels that they were double-crossed. The Angle campaign trusted me and that trust was violated,? James added.

Angle has the support of national and local tea party groups, but Ashjian?s candidacy threatened to drain votes away from her, which would help Reid in a close race. There are several minor-party candidates on the ballot ? a recent poll showed Ashjian with just 1 percent support ? and Nevada voters can also choose ?none of these candidates.?

In the recording Angle tells Ashjian, ?I?m not sure you can win and I?m not sure I can win if you?re hurting my chance, and that?s the part that scares me.? She laments that the GOP leaders have ?lost their standards, they?ve lost their principles.? She refers derisively to ?that good old boy thing? and depicts herself as an underdog David fighting Goliath ? the constricting machinery of the national party.

On the tape Ashjian complains his reputation has been unjustly damaged in the campaign. He grumbles about the Tea Party Express, a national political committee that ran ads earlier this year questioning his credentials and supporting Angle. He declines to support her.

It?s unclear who will succeed James as the leader of the obscure party that has done little fundraising or organizing so far and has been blasted by Republicans as a Democratic plant.

The recording surfaced at an awkward time for Angle ? the political arm of the Senate GOP is holding a fundraiser for her this week in Washington. A spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee could not immediately be reached for comment.

Kirsten Chadwick, a Republican lobbyist and former White House aide under President George W. Bush who is helping the GOP elect women candidates, was unmoved when told of the recording flap.

?I honestly hadn?t heard of it,? she said.

Las Vegas tea party volunteer Joyce Burnett said the meeting with Ashjian ?might not have been the smartest move.?

?If I were sitting across the table from her, I might say, ?Boy, what were you thinking with that??? said Burnett, who hosted a house party for Angle in August.

But Burnett said Angle?s attempted dealmaking had not dampened her support.

?There is always going to be a certain give and take,? Burnett said. ?That?s how the political system works.?


View the original article here

Tea Party planning big rally in KCK

A coalition of national tea party groups is planning a weekend political rally at The Woodlands racetrack this fall that could bring tens of thousands of people to the area.


The Freedom Jamboree will begin Sept. 30, although gates will open for campers and tailgaters two days earlier. Organizers said the event will include speeches, music and fireworks.


The event will climax with a presidential straw poll on Oct. 1.


“Freedom Jamboree is the national tea party event of 2011,” said William Temple of Brunswick, Ga., one of the organizers at a Tuesday news conference to announce details of the event. “We’re not going back to D.C. this year, we’re coming here to K.C.”


Temple said admittance to the event will be free and as many as 300,000 people might attend.


The coalition isn’t directly affiliated with better-known tea party groups such as FreedomWorks, Americans for Prosperity, or the Tea Party Express. Those groups and others have been invited to the event.


But organizers of several past tea party events wanted to reflect the grass-roots nature of their movement by avoiding a direct connection with those organizations, Temple said.


Hundreds of state tea party groups have been asked to send a delegate.


Potential GOP presidential candidates also have been invited, and at least one — Rep. Michele Bachmann — is expected to attend.


Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, a Republican, said the jamboree could play an important role in the presidential nomination process in his party.


“We don’t have a well-defined presidential field,” Kobach said. “We don’t have a presidential candidate who’s clearly assumed the mantle of speaking for the tea party. All of these things can crystallize in Kansas City. … That’s why I think you’re going to see some important things happening at this festival.”

@ Go to KansasCity.com for a video report. To reach Dave Helling, call 816-234-4656 or send email to dhelling@kcstar.com.


View the original article here

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Some Tea Party members dissatisfied with Speaker John Boehner

WEST CHESTER, OH (FOX19) -

Tea party members have been some of Speaker Boehner's biggest supporters; many even traveled to Washington D.C. to watch him be sworn in as Speaker of the House.? Now some are saying Boehner isn't being the bold leader he promised to be.

"There is a dissatisfaction with what John is doing right now and there is also a dissatisfaction with the mood or the tenor of things he says," said Jim Lewis, co-founder of the West Chester Tea Party.

Lewis said he was part of a small group of tea party members that met with Boehner on April 25, 2011.

"We were talking about the debt ceiling, and in that conversation it came up that yes the debt ceiling will have to be raised now and will probably have to be raised several more times," said Lewis.

When the U.S. reached it's legal debt limit earlier this week, Boehner released this statement: "There will be no debt limit increase without serious budget reforms and significant spending cuts - cuts that are greater than any increase in the debt limit."

Tea partiers?say they're?ready for those cuts to be implemented.

"We would like to see the $100 billion they promised in the first year in cuts, which never materialized, we would like to see that," said Lewis.?"We would like to see spending decreased across the board."

Speaker John Boehner's office released this statement to FOX19:

"Speaker Boehner has great respect for the tea party movement and identifies closely with many who consider themselves part of the movement. Not every tea party activist agrees with him on his approach to every issue, but he appreciates the input he receives both from those who do and from those who don't. The American people have a right to hold their leaders' feet to the fire, and he'd be disappointed if they did anything less."

Copyright 2011 FOX19. All Rights Reserved.


View the original article here

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Tea party questions Schaumburg’s sick-time policies

The Palatine Tea Party is holding up Schaumburg as the first example in its campaign against municipalities letting employees roll over sick time from year to year, saying it could cost taxpayers significant money without providing additional services.

But Schaumburg officials say their policy not only minimizes the number of workers paid for unused sick time at the end of their employment, but also improves cost-efficiency and productivity far beyond the ?use-it-or-lose-it? stance advocated by the tea party group.

Palatine Tea Party Coordinator Craig Mijares said Schaumburg records he obtained through a Freedom of Information request show that current village employees have accrued approximately $17 million in unused sick time. His concern is that taxpayers may be on the hook for that amount when those workers either leave or retire.

But Schaumburg Village Manager Ken Fritz said that claim shows Mijares? investigation of the issue wasn?t thorough. He estimates that no more than 15 to 25 percent of the village?s employees will ever receive any payout of unpaid sick time, and none will receive more than half the amount accrued.

?I wish they would ask more questions before they start throwing raw data around,? Fritz said. ?My frustration is that no one talks to us to get an actual explanation before they reach their conclusions.?

Under village policy, nonunion employees must wok at least 25 years for Schaumburg, have accumulated more than 700 to 800 hours of sick time to demonstrate they haven?t abused the system, have given 90 days notice of their departure and have a good performance record to be eligible for a 50 percent payout of their sick time.

For members of the village?s five labor unions, only a third of their unused sick time will be paid out if they meet all the criteria.

Fritz cited the recent retirement of finance Director Doug Ellsworth, at the time one the village?s highest paid employees. But as someone who worked for Schaumburg for only about a decade, Ellsworth wasn?t close to being able to cash in any of his sick time, Fritz said.

Mijares responded that if Schaumburg actually pays out as little of its unpaid sick time as Fritz says, it shouldn?t pay any at all.

?(Cutting) this program will not affect any services, any policemen or firemen,? Mijares said. ?I?m bringing to light how the elimination of this program won?t affect services. I?m not criticizing without a plan.?

Fritz believes a ?use-it-or-lose-it? policy advocated by the tea party group could cost taxpayers more if overtime was needed to fill in for workers who felt they had to use up their sick days unnecessarily.

Fritz and Mijares also disagreed over how common the rollover of sick time is in the private sector.

Mijares argued that such policies are virtually unknown in the private sector, seeing them as an example of government?s abuse of taxpayers.

?Sick time is to be used when you are sick ... period,? Mijares said. ?Sick time is not guaranteed time to be taken off. In the private sector, abuse is managed by requiring a doctor?s note for any sick absences exceeding three consecutive days.?

Fritz concedes that allowing employees to rollover sick time and then possibly receive a payout is more common in the public sector, but argued that it was adapted from similar policies among large private-sector employers.


View the original article here

Haley eyes tea party coalition

Gov. Nikki Haley said Friday she is recruiting members from tea parties across the state to advise her on getting results for the rest of her term.


The Governor's Tea Party Coalition could hold its first meeting within a month, with its members consulting with Haley in private about her agenda and what's going on in the state.


"This is trying to use the bully pulpit in a way that we get more people involved in their government, in a way that we get more people educated on the issues that affect them," she said. "And a way to get the Legislature to remember who they work for."


Charleston Tea Party members said they were intrigued by the idea and interested in learning how it will play out.


File

Governor Nikki Haley


The conservative-oriented movement sprung up nationwide in early 2009. Its South Carolina activists helped Haley triumph in a four-way GOP gubernatorial primary last year against three better-known opponents.


Haley said she considers herself a product of the tea parties, and also gives the movement credit for her legislative victories so far, such as on-the-record voting and the recent Voter ID bill.


"What I want to do is carry that to the next level, which is to create this coalition of leaders I met throughout the state when I was campaigning, leaders who continue to be supportive of me now," she said.


Haley said she hopes the coalition can help drum up grassroots support for other parts of her agenda, such as creating a new Department of Administration, tort reform and governmental restructuring efforts, such as having the governor and lieutenant governor running on the same ticket.


The coalition will remain informal, she said. It won't raise any money or require any state money. "This is very much like me meeting with my management team now or my administration team now," she said.


Haley's spokesman Rob Godfrey said coalition members will come from all corners of the state and will include Allen Olson, who Godfrey said has done "an incredible job with the Columbia Tea Party."


Haley said she is reaching out to other possible members.


Charleston Tea Party Chairman Mike Murphree said Friday he has heard about Haley's coalition plans, but had few details.


"We are glad to see what she's offering and what she's bringing to the table," he said.


While Murphree said his board members would be happy to discuss their possible involvement, some might wonder if this is a real horse or a Trojan one.


"We don't want to get too carried away. We want to stay a little hungry, a little on the outside edge," Murphree said. "If you get pulled into the middle, then you're no longer part of the tea party. You're part of the problem."


Jim Davis, who serves on the Charleston Tea Party board, said he appreciates the idea.


"The only reservation I would have is, how is she going about selecting the participants?" he added. "A lot of people want to go to rallies and make comments and so forth, but some of them aren't willing to get engaged and go to council meetings and go to legislators and talk with them about issues."


Some of her opponents, such as Democratic strategist Lachlan McIntosh, were more skeptical.


"It sure would be nice if Haley stopped pandering to the extremists in the tea party and instead formed a coalition with the state's business community that would help create jobs or a coalition with teachers and principals that would help improve our public schools," he said.


"She's putting the interests of her radical friends ahead of the needs of ordinary South Carolinians."


Haley said she hasn't settled on the size of the coalition, but said, "We're going to keep it small and strong and really results oriented."

Reach Robert Behre at 937-5771.


View the original article here

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Fashioning of afternoon tea

STEFANIE MOY-SHUSTER Submitted photo Tea sets as we know it today first appeared in the 1790s. These simply shaped vessels are called slop or waste bowls.
Afternoon tea is one of those pleasant breaks in the day. It can be as simple as carrying a mug with you as you walk around the garden or as elaborate as bringing out a lovely silver or china tea set, making cucumber sandwiches and a cake and inviting a group of friends to spend a civilized hour with you at four o'clock.


The custom of the tea party as we know it is relatively recent compared to the long history of tea drinking itself.


Tea came to Europe from China in the early 1630s, brought by Portuguese traders to France. It became terribly chic at the court of Louis XIV at Versailles where, in spite or perhaps because of how expensive it was, it was drunk in huge quantities.


One noblewoman, Mme. De Sevigny, wrote to her daughter that "the Princesse de Tarente takes 12 cups of tea a day, which she says cures all her ills." She also mentions M. de Landgrave, who drank 40 cups every morning and swore it revived him as he lay dying. Remember though that teacups in the 17th century were tiny— only about two inches in diameter. They were often shipped from China in the crates of tea.


Tea drinking became fashionable in England when Charles II married the Portuguese infanta, Catherine of Braganza. As part of her huge dowry, the English were granted permission to use all the Portuguese ports in Asia, giving England direct trading rights to tea.


The East India Company was given a monopoly on trade in the Far East and by the late 1760s, the British were exporting 6 million pounds of tea a year from China.


When it was first served in the coffee houses in London in about 1660, tea had to be explained to the public, but within a very short time, and with royal patronage, it quickly became the fashionable drink in all the best houses.


The growing popularity of tea saw the development of specialized equipment for storing it (tea caddies), making it (tea kettles set over spirit lamps) and serving it (the teapot). It also spurred on the search for a European equivalent to Chinese porcelain for it was thought that earthenware (the only type of china then made in Europe) was not fine enough to hold the glamorous new drink.


Porcelain was first successfully produced in England in about 1740 and soon replaced imported Chinese cups and teapots.


The tea service as we know it, either in silver or porcelain, first appeared in the 1790s. It consisted of a teapot, milk jug, sugar bowl, sometimes a hot water jug for replenishing the pot and a simply shaped open bowl like the ones shown here. The matching tray, which is often seen with a silver tea set was a later, Victorian addition.


These pretty bowls are known by the rather inelegant name of slop bowls or sometimes waste bowls. Every tea set had one until the widespread use of the teabag began in the decades after the First World War.

Tea until then always meant loose leaf tea, put directly in the pot. When a cup of tea was poured, a few leaves always escaped into the cup. Before a second cup was poured, the cup was rinsed with a little hot water and the residue was poured into the slop bowl. (The tea strainer held over the cups as tea was poured and the tea ball to hold the leaves were "genteel" Victorian refinements).


It became quite the rage in the late 18th and early 19th centuries to "read the tea leaves" before the cups were rinsed and it's easy to imagine groups of giddy young girls at informal tea parties eagerly looking to see if the tea leaves foretold good fortune or a handsome young man in the pattern they made in the cup.


All but one of the slop bowls shown date from about 1850 and were all probably made in Staffordshire, the great centre for English pottery and china. The largest bowl, on the left is about seven inches in diameter, quite large in comparison to the others which measure between four and five inches. It is part of what might be called an everyday tea set, with a correspondingly large tea pot, covered sugar bowl and milk jug. It is decorated with sprays of leaves in a brilliant cornflower blue interspersed with green lines.


The bowl at the top right is the only one that is marked but then only with the pattern name "Tokio." It is decorated with a blue and white transfer print of a vaguely Japanese landscape scene. The bowl at the bottom left is the smallest and is plain white with a simple overall decoration of dark pink lustre dots.


The upturned bowl at the bottom right is also decorated with a blue and white transfer print of country scenes in panels interspersed with elaborate scrolls and flowers. The inside rim of the bowl has a smaller version of the same design and a charming vignette of two boys fishing with a church in the background. The edges of the bowl are highlighted with pink lustre lines.


The bowl in the centre is later than the others. Its straight sides, all over ribbed exterior and the style of the delicate decoration of pink and yellow flowering branches and bluebirds suggest at later date of about 1900.


If you buy a complete tea set, bowls like these are easy to identify. However, sold on their own, they are often mistakenly labelled as open sugar bowls, centrepieces or sweetmeat dishes. Once you know what you are looking at, they are quite fun to collect and unless they are very fine china, can be surprisingly affordable.


You might want to revive the old custom of rinsing the cups and emptying the leaves in the slop bowl, but then again, with summer just ahead, you might also search out a pretty slop bowl to hold a lovely low arrangement of flowers from your garden.


Gay Guthrie is the proprietor of Sixty One and has an extensive background in antiques and as a museum curator.

Discuss this Article
Topic guidelines: We welcome your thoughts, stories and information related to this article. Please stay on topic and be respectful of others. Keep the conversation appropriate for interested readers.


View the original article here

Rep. Joe Heck walks tightrope when it comes to Tea Party

By Karoun Demirjian (contact)

Friday, May 20, 2011 | 1:55 a.m.


WASHINGTON — You won’t find Rep. Joe Heck joining picket lines around the Capitol, calling for a government shutdown.


You won’t find his name on letters to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and President Barack Obama, demanding reckonings and resignations over their stances on budgets and Medicare.


You won’t always even see him voting Republican.


But when Heck appears before the Tea Party in Nevada, they seem to love him.


“I am behind him 100 percent and everyone I know is behind him,” said Vicki Dooling, a founding member of the Las Vegas Valley Tea Party who also works for the national networking vehicle TheTeaParty.net. “I don’t believe he’s left his Tea Party roots at all. He’s a sensible, no-nonsense, common-sense person. And that’s what Tea Partyers are all about.”


It’s high praise that Heck, who’s never taken on the “Tea Party” title, hasn’t had to work for the support as hard as some of his colleagues since he arrived on Capitol Hill, and for the sort of allegiance that most Republicans would kill to have without extra-special exertion. But Democrats warn that appearances can be deceiving: Just because Heck doesn’t proudly bear the Tea Party banner doesn’t mean he isn’t serving its agenda.


Republicans have been locked in a push-and-pull struggle with the Tea Party faction ever since the upstart, ultraconservative movement helped the GOP dominate the 2010 midterms and sweep 87 new Republicans into the House.


The Tea Party takes credit for Heck’s victory. He enjoyed a strong showing of Tea Party support last year, though he never officially dubbed himself a party member.


But since he’s arrived in Washington, he has huddled with, and even swung to the left of, Republican leadership a lot more than he stumps with the freshman revolutionaries sounding their political fifes and drums.


Heck wouldn’t, for example, join the majority of his freshman colleagues — even though he’s one of the three who represents them on the Steering Committee — last month when they wrote to Reid, telling him to move on their fiscal 2011 budget bill or “step aside” — as in resign. Nor would he add his name to a letter cosigned by about half the freshman class last week, calling on President Obama and Democrats to stop peddling “MediSCARE” tactics about the Medicare changes in Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget for fiscal 2012.


He’s also broken rank with his party on votes. In March, Heck was the only Republican to vote to preserve the Obama administration’s home mortgage assistance program, even as Nevada Democrat Shelley Berkley walked away from it, calling it too flawed to save. He also refused to join the “shut it down” cheers many freshman representatives raised during last month’s last-minute votes to stave off a government shutdown, urging his party to stop grandstanding over policy riders because “the most important thing we need to do is keep the government open — followed by cutting spending.”


He said he took those positions to serve his district, but they didn’t sit so well with the Tea Party at home.


“The consensus is that Joe Heck is doing a fair job as a junior congressman. No politician has a 100 percent approval rating,” Jeri Taylor-Swade, a Tea Partyer starting up a conservative news publication in Nevada. “But as long as Joe continues to vote in a way that a majority of conservatives can agree with, then we will continue his support into the next election.


“We realize that he is representing more people in the Republican Party than the Tea Party-minded people,” she said, adding that Heck’s more moderate votes, so far, haven’t cost him her support. “We would have to wait until he does a big fat negative ... we’re watching Joe and he knows it.”


Heck’s no liberal, and hasn’t gone totally rogue on the GOP. When it comes to the big, national issues, like health care, Medicare, and oil subsidies, he’s in lock step with the party and the Tea Party line.


That’s why the Democrats say he’s cut from the same cloth.


“Just because you’re not out there demanding to see the president’s birth certificate doesn’t mean that you’re not voting the Tea Party’s agenda,” said Zach Hudson, spokesman for the Nevada Democratic Party. “Their agenda is not the agenda the people of the Third Congressional District want.”

Click to enlarge photo Leila Navidi

Rep. Joe Heck, R-Nev. speaks during a town hall meeting at Green Valley High School in Henderson Wednesday, February 2, 2011.


Added Gabriela Domenzain, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee: “Rep. Joe Heck’s extreme positions to end Medicare and protect subsidies for Big Oil, privatize Social Security and abolish the Department of Education are out of touch with Nevadans.”


Heck’s office’s read of his relationship with the Tea Party is fairly matter-of-fact.


“This is not about the Tea Party vs. Republicans vs. Democrats vs. progressives; it’s not about any one individual,” said Heck’s spokesman Darren Littell, who stressed that communication has been key to Heck’s maintaining a positive working relationship with all his constituents.


“If he takes a vote that he knows the Tea Party isn’t going to like, even if the Tea Party doesn’t like it, he’s still going to take the vote, and then he’ll tell them why,” Littell said. “Joe knows how he votes and why he votes on everything.”


That’s a fairly liberating position for Republicans to be in these days. Tea Partyers have shown they’re a force to reckoned with, especially within the Republican caucus, and many Republicans still worry about answering to a Tea Party constituency when they’re at home.


But if Heck has more freedom than his congressional colleagues, it may just be the luck of his district.


“It really depends on the district and the individual ... he votes his district, and that makes perfect sense,” said Tyler Houlton, Western spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee, in explaining why Heck’s relationship with the Tea Party might differ from other Republicans nationally. “Their districts are very different, their states are very different, and their Tea Partys are even a little different, too.”


Heck doesn’t have to pander to the Tea Party because he doesn’t have to worry about a serious primary challenger, analysts say, and both Heck and the Tea Party know it.


“Heck was not the darling of the conservatives ... but when he shifted over from running for governor to take on Dina Titus, he became by default the best choice,” said Eric Herzik, professor of political science at UNR. “Now, it’s like a marriage of convenience.”


“You run a conservative Republican against Joe Heck in the primary, you can give that district to the Democrats,” said David Damore, who teaches political science at UNLV.

Karoun Demirjian

Rep. Joe Heck blows a kiss to his wife in the House gallery after taking his oath on Wednesday, Jan. 5, 2011.


Heck does have to worry about Democrats, especially those at the center. While the boundaries and demographics of his congressional district for next year aren’t clear yet, he’s likely going to face a mixed field, and last time, even with the power of Republican momentum, he only eked out a victory by 1,748 votes.


“The Tea Party is a significant interest, but there are many significant interests,” Damore said. “And their power is more in who they can hurt rather than who they can help.”


In an ideal world, the Tea Party remains content to stay a relatively silent part of Heck’s base. But before he can count on the terms of that marriage, Heck and the Tea Party’s union will be tested — but likely only by a policy juggernaut so big it commands the Tea Party’s attention.


They’re with him on Ryan’s fiscal 2012 budget and health care. They accepted his votes on the budget for fiscal 2011. So the likeliest test of their staying power is the upcoming vote to raise the debt ceiling — a vote that’s already begun to inspire Tea Party ire. Heck said his decision, which he hasn’t announced yet, will be heavily influenced by how much the government is able to reduce spending — but he may ultimately feel he needs to take it to keep the government humming.


At that point, if Heck isn’t willing to bend, Damore said, the Tea Party may break away.


“If the Tea Party leaves him alone, but votes for him, that’s what he needs,” Damore said. “He needs a unified Republican Party, Tea Party and otherwise. If the Tea Party went after him, he’d be dead. Because he wouldn’t have a Republican base.”


View the original article here

Monday, May 23, 2011

A House Divided? Tea Party Vs. Traditional GOP

Some leading Republicans are trying to entice a more established candidate to jump into the presidential race, a courtship that's aggravating tensions between tea partyers and the GOP's traditional business wing, a deep-pocketed source of financial support in the campaign.

Influential GOP donors have sought to coax Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush or New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie to run. The goal is to find a contender with a strong record as a fiscal conservative and the political stature to challenge President Barack Obama.

The behind-the-scenes efforts have been taken as a snub by some tea party organizers who favor the anti-establishment messages of Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, businessman Herman Cain and Texas Rep. Ron Paul, who are in the race or are considering it. New contenders could undermine their chances for donors and for success.

"It's extremely upsetting to hear that the establishment is courting their own candidate when Michele Bachmann, the gold standard, has been in the fight, bucking the establishment that got us in this mess," said Katrina Pierson, a Dallas tea party leader and emerging national figure for the movement.

Daniels, Bush and Christie are all connected with the GOP's organized fundraising bigwigs, not the more numerous but less affluent grass-roots conservatives, said Connecticut tea party leader Bob MacGuffie.

"We're trying to lead the big money with the small money, and they won't let it," said MacGuffie, who helped coordinate confrontational town hall meetings with members of Congress in 2009 about federal health care legislation.

The 2012 Republican field is wide open.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is considered the closest to a front-runner, but his support for his state's health care plan has alienated some conservatives. Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty is not widely known.

The tea party movement, which advocates a much smaller government, was an energetic force in the 2010 elections. It has provided an audience for possible candidates such as Bachmann, a junior House member who has reveled in clashing with GOP elders.

Bachmann has generated enthusiastic responses from tea party activists in Iowa, where the GOP nominating caucuses are set to begin the 2012 run to the nomination. She said the search for a more traditional candidate could turn off some newly engaged conservative voters, whom the GOP needs to defeat Obama.

"I think people really want to know they are being heard, and when it appears that people's concerns are being bypassed, by looking at other candidates, they really do feel like they are being ignored," Bachmann said. "I understand that frustration."

Former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum are trying to appeal to both tea party and establishment Republicans. Neither has made much visible headway in Iowa.

Joan Fabiano, a tea party leader in the Lansing, Mich., area, weighed in about Bachmann and the other more confrontational candidates. "The establishment believes they aren't controllable. And that's a big problem with us," she said.

Pawlenty promotes himself as outside the Washington establishment but with a record of winning in a politically divided state. He said the search by dissatisfied donors for better candidates could help endear him to anti-establishment conservatives.

"To the extent there is an attempt by the establishment to coronate somebody, I can easily see that frustrating and alienating activists across the board," Pawlenty said.

A group of Iowa Republican donors plans to meet with Christie in New Jersey later in May to try to persuade him to enter the race. The first-term governor, who has attracted national attention as an aggressive budget-cutter, has ruled out running. Daniels, formerly a former business executive and White House budget director, plans to announce his plans in the next few weeks. Bush has said he isn't considering a campaign.


View the original article here

Tea Party Movement

Next, we'd like to get your overall opinion of some people in the news. As I read each name, please say if you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of these people -- or if you have never heard of them. How about -- The Tea Party Movement?

Do you consider yourself to be -- [ROTATED: a supporter of the Tea Party movement, an opponent of the Tea Party movement], or neither?

As I read some names and groups, please tell me how much confidence you have in each to do or to recommend the right thing for the economy -- a great deal, a fair amount, only a little, or almost none. How about -- Tea Party movement leaders

How important should it be for the Republican leaders in Congress to take into account the objectives and positions of the Tea Party movement when it comes to dealing with the problems facing the nation -- very important, somewhat important, not too important, or not important at all?

Of the following, who would you like to have the most influence on federal government policies over the next year -- [RANDOM ORDER: President Obama, the Democratic leaders in Congress, the Republican leaders in Congress, (or) Republican members of Congress supported by the Tea Party movement]?

Republican members of Congress supported by the Tea Party movement

The Republican leaders in Congress

The Democratic leaders in Congress

Regardless of whether you support or oppose the Tea Party movement, do you think it has or has not done each of the following? How about -- [RANDOM ORDER]?

Energized people to get more involved in the political process

Made the political parties more responsive to the views of ordinary citizens

Created deeper political divisions in the U.S. than previously existed

Do you consider yourself to be -- [ROTATED: a supporter of the Tea Party movement, an opponent of the Tea Party movement], or neither?

(Asked of those who support the Tea Party movement) Would you say you are active in the Tea Party movement, or supportive of the Tea Party movement but not active in it? By active, we mean attending Tea Party rallies, donating money or working on the campaigns of candidates endorsed by the Tea Party.

COMBINED RESULTS: BASED ON NATIONAL ADULTS

(Active in Tea Party movement)

(Not active in Tea Party movement)

Since Barack Obama took office, do you think the Republican Party has become more conservative, or not?

(Asked of those who think the Republican Party has gotten more conservative) Do you think the Republican Party has become more conservative mostly because of the influence of the Tea Party movement or mostly for other reasons?

COMBINED RESPONSES: BASED ON NATIONAL ADULTS

(Mostly because of Tea Party influence)


View the original article here

Sunday, May 22, 2011

GOP efforts to court mainline White House candidates for 2012 race seen as tea party snub

The Fix | Chris Cillizza2chambers | Felicia SonmezFederal Eye | Ed O’KeefeFact Checker | Glenn KesslerOpinionsAll OpinionsPostPartisanLeft-LeaningRight-LeaningTolesCartoonsTelnaesAnimationsLocalColumnist IndexLocalCrimeDC PoliticsEducationMaryland PoliticsObituariesTraffic & CommutingVirginia PoliticsWeatherBlogs & ColumnsSpecial ReportsTop Blogs

The State of NoVa | Top 10 End of Days SongsThe Buzz | A lottery winner’s dilemmaGoing Out Gurus | And the new burger boss is ...Dr. Gridlock | This weekend and beyondSportsRedskins/NFLCapitals/NHLWizards/NBANationals/MLBDC United/SoccerCollegesAllMetSportsOther SportsBlogs & ColumnsTop Blogs

Capitals Insider| Katie CarreraNationals Journal| Adam KilgoreSoccer Insider| Steven GoffThe Insider| Mike JonesNationalCorrectionsEnergy & EnvironmentHealth & ScienceHigher EducationNational SecurityOn FaithOn LeadershipBlogs& ColumnsSpecial ReportsWorldAfricaTheAmericasAsia &PacificEuropeMiddle EastNational SecurityWar ZonesSpecial ReportsBusinessEconomyIndustriesLocal BusinessMarketsPolicy&RegulationTechnologyWorldBusinessBlogs & ColumnsSpecial ReportsInvestigationsLifestyleAdviceCarolyn HaxFoodHome & GardenStyleTravelWeddingsWellnessBlogs & ColumnsTop Blogs

On Parenting | Janice D’ArcyArts Post | Jacqueline TrescottThe Checkup | Jennifer LaRue Huget & Rob SteinAll We Can Eat | Food sectionEntertainmentBooksCelebritiesComicsGoing Out GuideHoroscopesMoviesMuseumsPuzzlesTheater & DanceTVTop Blogs

Reliable Source | Roxanne Roberts & Amy ArgetsingerTV Column | Lisa de MoraesCelebritology | Jen ChaneyClick Track | Chris Richards & David mailReprints By Associated Press,

DES MOINES, Iowa — Some leading Republicans are trying to entice a more established candidate to jump into the presidential race, a courtship that’s aggravating tensions between tea partyers and the GOP’s traditional business wing, a deep-pocketed source of financial support in the campaign.


Influential GOP donors have sought to coax Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush or New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie to run. The goal is to find a contender with a strong record as a fiscal conservative and the political stature to challenge President Barack Obama.

Loading...

Comments

Weigh InCorrections?Tweet



) - FILE - In this May 12, 2011, file photo New Jersey Governor Chris Christie speaks at a New York conference of the Committee of 100, group of business, government and civic leaders who work to bridge U.S.-China relations. Tensions between tea partyers and more traditional Republicans are rising as GOP’s traditional business wing tries to entice a more established candidate to jump into the 2012 presidential race. These influential donors have sought to coax Christie, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush run.


The behind-the-scenes efforts have been taken as a snub by some tea party organizers who favor the anti-establishment messages of Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, businessman Herman Cain and Texas Rep. Ron Paul, who are in the race or are considering it. New contenders could undermine their chances for donors and for success.


“It’s extremely upsetting to hear that the establishment is courting their own candidate when Michele Bachmann, the gold standard, has been in the fight, bucking the establishment that got us in this mess,” said Katrina Pierson, a Dallas tea party leader and emerging national figure for the movement.


Daniels, Bush and Christie are all connected with the GOP’s organized fundraising bigwigs, not the more numerous but less affluent grass-roots conservatives, said Connecticut tea party leader Bob MacGuffie.


“We’re trying to lead the big money with the small money, and they won’t let it,” said MacGuffie, who helped coordinate confrontational town hall meetings with members of Congress in 2009 about federal health care legislation.


The 2012 Republican field is wide open.


Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is considered the closest to a front-runner, but his support for his state’s health care plan has alienated some conservatives. Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty is not widely known.


The tea party movement, which advocates a much smaller government, was an energetic force in the 2010 elections. It has provided an audience for possible candidates such as Bachmann, a junior House member who has reveled in clashing with GOP elders.


Bachmann has generated enthusiastic responses from tea party activists in Iowa, where the GOP nominating caucuses are set to begin the 2012 run to the nomination. She said the search for a more traditional candidate could turn off some newly engaged conservative voters, whom the GOP needs to defeat Obama.


“I think people really want to know they are being heard, and when it appears that people’s concerns are being bypassed, by looking at other candidates, they really do feel like they are being ignored,” Bachmann said. “I understand that frustration.”


Former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum are trying to appeal to both tea party and establishment Republicans. Neither has made much visible headway in Iowa.


Joan Fabiano, a tea party leader in the Lansing, Mich., area, weighed in about Bachmann and the other more confrontational candidates. “The establishment believes they aren’t controllable. And that’s a big problem with us,” she said.


Pawlenty promotes himself as outside the Washington establishment but with a record of winning in a politically divided state. He said the search by dissatisfied donors for better candidates could help endear him to anti-establishment conservatives.


“To the extent there is an attempt by the establishment to coronate somebody, I can easily see that frustrating and alienating activists across the board,” Pawlenty said.


A group of Iowa Republican donors plans to meet with Christie in New Jersey later in May to try to persuade him to enter the race. The first-term governor, who has attracted national attention as an aggressive budget-cutter, has ruled out running. Daniels, formerly a former business executive and White House budget director, plans to announce his plans in the next few weeks. Bush has said he isn’t considering a campaign.


Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


EmailTumblrRedditStumbleuponDiggDeliciousLinkedInTweet

???initialComments:true! pubdate:05/21/2011 09:19 EDT! commentPeriod:3! commentEndDate:5/24/11 9:19 EDT! currentDate:5/21/11 9:28 EDT! allowComments:true! displayComments:false!Weigh InDiscussion PolicyAbout Discussions, Badges ?

Comments our editors find particularly useful or relevant are displayed in Top Comments, as are comments by users with these badges: . Replies to those posts appear here, as well as posts by staff writers.


All comments are posted in the All Comments tab.

More about badgesGet a badge Newest firstOldest firstMost Recommended first SuperFan


SuperFan badge holders consistently post smart, timely comments about Washington area sports and teams.


If your comments or those of another user measure up, please let Post editors know.

Get a badgeNominate someone for a badge Fact Checker


Fact Checkers contribute questions, information and facts to The Fact Checker.


If your comments or those of another user measure up, please let Post editors know.

Get a badgeNominate someone for a badge Washingtologist


Washingtologists consistently post thought provoking, timely comments on events, communities, and trends in the Washington area.


If your comments or those of another user measure up, please let Post editors know.

Get a badgeNominate someone for a badge Post Writer


This commenter is a Washington Post editor, reporter or producer.

Post Forum


Post Forum members consistently offer thought provoking, timely comments on politics, national and international affairs.


If your comments or those of another user measure up, please let Post editors know.

Get a badgeNominate someone for a badge Post Recommended


Washington Post reporters or editors recommend this comment or reader post.


You must be logged in to report a comment.

Sign in here

You must be logged in to recommend a comment.

Sign in here
Comments our editors find particularly useful or relevant are displayed in Top Comments, as are comments by users with these badges: . Replies to those posts appear here, as well as posts by staff writers. + SHARE THIS DEBATEPeople who read this also read...SlateSlate V: Judgment Day 2011Tracey Emin: The enfant terrible's first London retrospective.Friday Night Lights: Thank you Lord, for Billy Riggins. TWP_Debug.pagedebug && window.console && console.log && console.log('[' + (new Date()-TWP_Debug.initialTime)/1000 + ']' + ' right_rail_shell.jpt - start');Trove link goes hereLinkLink Network News Hide this

Most Popular Friends' Activity Most Popular Most Tweeted Twitter Activity

Most Popular Right Now


Your Friends’ Most Recent Activity

Follow The Post: Facebook Twitter View More Activity

The Post Most: PoliticsMost-viewed stories, videos and galleries int he past two hours

Most Popular SectionFrustrated with Democrats, some large unions cut back on donationsDominique Strauss-Kahn is under house arrest in ManhattanOne more in GOP 2012 field: Radio host, pizza magnate Herman Cain joins growing racHuntsman tests the waters carefullyObama misses deadline for congressional approval of Libya operationsTop VideosObama, Netanyahu make no progressSchwarzenegger puts acting career on holdObama, Netanyahu meetFirst lady's plane in close callSeth Meyers mocks Trump, Biden at press dinnerTop GalleriesJon Huntsman Jr.Political wives: Marriages in the spotlightNewt Gingrich announces for presidentJohn Boehner, speaker of the HouseFederal shutdowns in the 1990sPOTUS Tracker

Friday, May 20, 2011

10 a.m.Obama receives the Presidential Daily Briefing11:15 a.m.Obama meets with Prime Minister Netanyahu of Israel 12:05 p.m.Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu deliver statements to the press12:30 p.m.Obama holds a working lunch with Prime Minister Netanyahu3:10 p.m.Obama delivers remarks to CIA Employees Congressional Database Browser every vote in the U.S. Congress since 1991 or search the database to see how your member voted on a particular issue.

Explore the 111thHouseSenateBillsHouseH R 754May 13, 2011MoreHouseH R 754May 13, 2011MoreHouseH R 754May 13, 2011MoreSenateOn the Cloture MotionMay 19, 2011MoreSenateOn the Motion to ProceedMay 18, 2011MoreSenateOn the Motion to ProceedMay 17, 2011MoreBillH R 1473(Title not available.)MoreBillH R 1423(Title not available.)MoreBillH R 1363(Title not available.)More FIND MEMBERS OF CONGRESS

Politics Newsletters

Sign-up for e-mail newsletters and alerts and get the news you need delivered directly to your inbox.

?Behind the Government ShowdownAfternoon FixEzra Klein's WonkbookFederal InsiderMorning FixPolitics News & AnalysisPolitics News AlertsSunday Agenda & RoundupSee all Washington Post Newsletters

var fixLink = function(){ //console.log("content ready"); var link = $("#rev_ad2").find("a.right-arrow"); link.attr('href','http://www.slate.com');}YUI().use('node-base',function(Y) { Y.on("contentready", fixLink, ".rev-widget");})Connect with Post Politics

Politics

Facebook: Become a fan of Washington Post Politics

Twitter: Follow us on Twitter

RSS: Subscribe to our RSS feeds

Alerts: Sign up for news alerts

Mobile: Washington Post on the go

App Store: View our iPhone applications

Featured Advertiser LinksOil Spill, Mesothelioma Class Action, Femur Fracture, Navy Veterans, Asbestos News Center, Dross, Mesothelioma Symptoms>>Gas Drilling, Metal on Metal Hip, Mesothelioma Treatment, Yaz, Asbestos cancer, Knee loosening>>Looking to buy a home? Visit TWP Real Estate section for the latest open houses.>>Make Your Vanguard Investing More Profitable - Free Research Report Reveals Best & Worst Funds>>TWP_Debug.pagedebug && window.console && console.log && console.log('[' + (new Date()-TWP_Debug.initialTime)/1000 + ']' + ' right_rail_shell.jpt - end');TWP_Debug.pagedebug && window.console && console.log && console.log('[' + (new Date()-TWP_Debug.initialTime)/1000 + ']' + ' skeleton - end'); Politics Links

CampaignsCongressCourts &LawThe Fed PageHealth CarePolling White HouseWho Runs GovBlogs & Columns Ways you can get us

Mobile Podcasts Apps Newsletter & alerts Widgets RSS Post Store Facebook Photo Store Twitter Washington Post Live The Washington Post

About Us Work for us Community Relations PostPoints Corrections/Suggestions Archive Contact the Ombudsman Web site

Make us your homepage Newspaper

Subscribe Home delivery service e-Replica Advertise

In the newspaper On the web site Mobile Events The Washington Post Company

Post Company web sites Partners Slate Who Runs Gov Express Night Out Captial Business El Tiempo Latino The Root Foreign Policy Trove Post Tickets Capitol Deal Service Alley c 1996- The Washington Post User Agreement and Privacy Policy Rights and Permissions Help Contact Us Ad Choices TWP_Debug.pagedebug && window.console && console.log && console.log('[' + (new Date()-TWP_Debug.initialTime)/1000 + ']' + ' js/footer.jpt - footer start');TWP_Debug.pagedebug && window.console && console.log && console.log('[' + (new Date()-TWP_Debug.initialTime)/1000 + ']' + ' js/footer.jpt - footer done');TWP_Debug.pagedebug && window.console && console.log && console.log('[' + (new Date()-TWP_Debug.initialTime)/1000 + ']' + ' frameset - end');

View the original article here